So you want to answer the phone call for Papers? It provides suggestions for the information and presentation of this abstract, in addition to types of the best abstracts submitted to your 2012-2013 selection that is abstract when it comes to ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.
Typically, an abstract describes the topic you’d like to present during the conference, highlighting your argument, evidence and contribution to the literature that is historical. It will always be restricted to 250-500 words. Your message limit can be challenging: some graduate students do not fret throughout the limit that is short hastily write and submit an abstract in the last second, which often hurts their chances of being accepted; other students make an effort to condense the Next Great American Novel into 250 words, which can be equally damning. Graduate students who approach the abstract early, plan accordingly, and carefully edit are the ones most often invited to present their research. If you are intimidated by the project, don’t be – the abstract is a form that is fairly standardized of. Follow the guidelines that are basic and steer clear of common pitfalls and you may greatly boost your abstract.
Diligently follow all abstract style and formatting guidelines. Most CFPs will specify word or page length, and maybe some layout or style guidelines. Some CFPs, however, will list very specific restrictions, including font, font size, spacing, text justification, margins, how to present quotes, how to present authors and works, whether or not to include footnotes or otherwise not. Ensure that you strictly abide by all guidelines, including submission instructions. If a CFP does not provide abstract style and formatting guidelines, it is generally appropriate to stay around 250 words – abstract committees read a lot of these things plus don’t look fondly on comparatively long abstracts. Make sure that you orient your abstract topic to deal with any specific CFP themes, time periods, methods, and/or buzzwords.
With a 250-500 word limit, write only what is necessary, avoiding wordiness. Use active voice and pay attention to excessive phrasing that is prepositional.
Plan your abstract carefully before writing it. A abstract that is good address the following questions: What is the historical question or problem? Contextualize your topic. What is your thesis/argument? It must be original. What exactly is your evidence? State forthrightly that you’re using source material that is primary. How exactly does your paper fit into the historiography? What’s happening in the field of study and exactly how does your paper subscribe to it? Why does it matter? We all know the subject is important to you, why should it is crucial that you the selection committee that is abstract?
You need to be as specific as you possibly can, avoiding overly broad or statements that are overreaching claims. And that’s it: don’t get sidetracked by writing narrative that is too much over explaining. Say what you ought to say and nothing more.
Maintain your audience in mind. How much background you give on a subject will depend on the conference. Could be the conference a broad humanities conference, a graduate that is general history conference, or something like that more specific like a 1960s social revolutions conference? Your pitch should be worthy of the specificity associated with conference: the more specific the topic, the less background that is broad want to give and vice versa.
Revise and edit your abstract to ensure its presentation that is final is free. The editing phase is also the time that is best to visit your abstract as a whole and chip away at unnecessary words or phrases. The final draft should be linear and clear plus it should read smoothly. If you’re tripping over something while reading, the abstract selection committee will as well. Ask another graduate student to read your abstract to ensure its clarity or attend a Graduate Student Writing Group meeting.
Your language should be professional as well as your style should stay glued to standards that are academic. Contractions might be appealing because of the expressed word limits, but they must be avoided. If citation guidelines are not specifically given, it really is appropriate to use the name that is author’s title of work (in a choice of italics or quotation marks) within the text rather than use footnotes or in-text citations.
While one question, if really good, might be posed in your abstract, you need to avoid writing more than one (maybe two, if really really good). If you do pose a concern or two, make certain you either answer it or address why the question matters to your conference paper – unless you’re posing an obvious rhetorical question, you should never just let a question hang there. Way too many questions uses up an excessive amount of space and leaves less room if you are going to address one or all in your paper and if you even know the answers to them for you to develop your argument, methods, evidence, historiography, etc. Often times, posing too many questions leaves the abstract committee wondering. Remember, you’re not expected to have previously written your conference paper, you are expected to own done enough research that you are ready to come http://www.essay-911.com up with a certain topic that you can adequately cover in 15-20 minutes. Prove that you have inked so.
Language that can help you be as specific as possible in presenting your argument is very good but don’t ensure you get your readers bogged down in jargon. They’ll certainly be reading a lot of abstracts and won’t want to wade through the language that is unnecessary. Ensure that it stays simple.
When students repeat claims, they often don’t realize these are generally performing this. Sometimes this occurs because students are not yet clear on their argument. Think about it some more and then write. Other times, students write carelessly and don’t proofread. Make sure each sentence is exclusive and that it contributes to the flow of one’s abstract.
The committee that is abstract not need to be reminded associated with the grand sweep of history in order to contextualize your topic. Place your topic specifically inside the historiography.
The samples below represent the five scoring samples that are highest submitted into the selection committee when it comes to ninth annual graduate student history conference, 2012-2013. Two of the samples below were subsequently selected for publication into the NC State Graduate Journal of History. Outstanding papers presented in the graduate student history conference are suitable for publication by panel commentators. Papers go through a peer review process before publication.